Neuro-Reha

Mit einer entschiedenen Positionierung reagieren Carlos González Blum und Erwin Scherfer auf einen in physiopraxis 9/22 veröffentlichten Artikel zur Bewegungsqualität. Sie weisen die dort geäußerte Befürchtung, eine Nichtbeachtung der Bewegungsqualität könnte sich negativ auf die Neuroreha von Menschen nach Schlaganfall auswirken, zurück. In ihren Augen gibt es keine wissenschaftliche Grundlage für diese Annahme. Sie pochen auf einen leitlinienkonformen, aufgabenspezifischen, intensiven, hochrepetitiven und aeroben Behandlungsansatz, der nicht zuletzt auch Komorbiditäten verhindert.

• Literaturverzeichnis

• 1 Huber M. Das „Wie“ ist entscheidend – Die Renaissance der Bewegungsqualität. Physiopraxis. 2022; 20 (09) 46-50
• 2 Eng JJ, Bird M-L, Godecke E. et al Moving stroke rehabilitation research evidence into clinical practice: Consensus-based core recommendations from the Stroke Recovery and Rehabilitation Roundtable. International Journal of Stroke. 2019; 14 (08) 766-773
• 3 Bernhardt J, Borschmann KN, Kwakkel G. et al Setting the scene for the Second Stroke Recovery and Rehabilitation Roundtable. Int J Stroke. 2019; 14 (05) 450-456
• 4 Kwakkel G, Van Wegen E, Burridge J. et al Standardized measurement of quality of upper limb movement after stroke: Consensus-based core recommendations from the Second Stroke Recovery and Rehabilitation Roundtable. International Journal of Stroke. 2019; 14 (08) 783-791
• 5 Krakauer JW, Cortés JC. A non-task-oriented approach based on high-dose playful movement exploration for rehabilitation of the upper limb early after stroke: A proposal. NeuroRehabilitation 2018; 43: 31-40
• 6 Krakauer JW, Kitago T, Goldsmith J. et al Comparing a Novel Neuroanimation Experience to Conventional Therapy for High-Dose Intensive Upper-Limb Training in Subacute Stroke: The SMARTS2 Randomized Trial. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2021; 35: 393-405
• 7 Winstein CJ, Wolf SL, Dromerick AW. et al 2016. Effect of a Task-Oriented Rehabilitation Program on Upper Extremity Recovery Following Motor Stroke: The ICARE Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA 315 (06) 571-581
• 8 Lewthwaite R, Winstein CJ, Lane CJ. et al Accelerating Stroke Recovery: Body Structures and Functions, Activities, Participation, and Quality of Life Outcomes From a Large Rehabilitation Trial. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2018; 32: 150-165
• 9 Winstein CJ. et al 2013. Interdisciplinary Comprehensive Arm Rehabilitation Evaluation (ICARE): a randomized controlled trial protocol. BMC neurology vol. 13 5
• 10 Lotter JK, Henderson CE, Plawecki A. et al Task-Specific Versus Impairment-Based Training on Locomotor Performance in Individuals With Chronic Spinal Cord Injury: A Randomized Crossover Study. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2020; 34 (07) 627-639
• 11 Routson RL, Clark DJ, Bowden MG. et al The influence of locomotor rehabilitation on module quality and post-stroke hemiparetic walking performance. Gait Posture 2013; 38: 511-517
• 12 Mahtani GB. et al Altered Sagittal- and Frontal-Plane Kinematics Following High Intensity Stepping Training Versus Conventional Interventions in Subacute Stroke. Physical Therapy Journal. 2017; 97 (03) 320-329
• 13 Ardestani MM. et al Compensation or Recovery? Altered Kinetics and Neuromuscular Synergies Following High-Intensity Stepping Training Poststroke. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair. 2019; 33 (01) 47-58
• 14 Hornby TG, Campbell DD, Kahn JH. et al Enhanced gait-related improvements after therapist- versus robotic-assisted locomotor training in subjects with chronic stroke: a randomized controlled study. Stroke 2008; 39: 1786-1792
• 15 Hornby TG, Reisman DS, Ward IG. et al Clinical Practice Guideline to Improve Locomotor Function Following Chronic Stroke, Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury, and Brain Injury. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2020; 44 (01) 49-100
• 16 Handlery R, Regan EW, Stewart JC. et al Predictors of Daily Steps at 1-Year Poststroke: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial. Stroke. 2021; 52 (05) 1768-1777
• 17 Hornby TG, Henderson CE, Holleran CL, Lovell L, Roth EJ, Jang JH. Stepwise Regression and Latent Profile Analyses of Locomotor Outcomes Poststroke. Stroke. 2020; 51 (10) 3074-3082
• 18 Kono Y, Kawajiri H, Kamisaka K, Kamiya K, Akao K, Asai C, Inuzuka K, Yamada S. Predictive impact of daily physical activity on new vascular events in patients with mild ischemic stroke. Int J Stroke. 2015; 10: 219-223
• 19 Lang CE, Macdonald JR, Reisman DS. et al Observation of amounts of movement practice provided during stroke rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009; 90 (10) 1692-1698
• 20 Hesse S. Treadmill training with partial body weight support after stroke: a review. NeuroRehabilitation 2008: 55-65
• 21 MacKay-Lyons MJ, Makrides L. Cardiovascular stress during a contemporary stroke rehabilitation program: is the intensity adequate to induce a training effect?. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2002: 1378-1383
• 22 Carty C, van der Ploeg HP, Biddle SJH. et al The First Global Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior Guidelines for People Living With Disability. J Phys Act Health. 2021; 18 (01) 86-93
• 23 Martin Ginis KA, van der Scheer JW, Latimer-Cheung AE. et al Evidence-based scientific exercise guidelines for adults with spinal cord injury: an update and a new guideline. Spinal Cord. 2018; 56: 308-321
• 24 ANPT National Campaign: Intensity matters. Zugänglich unter:. https://www.neuropt.org/practice-resources/best-practice-initiatives-and-resources/intensity_matters [abgerufen am 11.11.2022]
• 25 Sheets P, et al Moving Forward. Journal of Neurologic Physical Therapy: January 2021; 45 (01) 46-49
• 26 IBITA. Bobath Concept-Definition. Zugänglich unter:. https://ibita.org/bobath-concept-definition/ [abgerufen am 11.11.2022]
• 27 ANPT National Campaign: Evidence elevates. Zugänglich unter. https://www.neuropt.org/practice-resources/best-practice-initiatives-and-resources/moving-forward [abgerufen am 11.11.2022]